I think the most important take away from all the readings thus far is that Digital Humanities is not one thing or even a field of study. Digital Humanities is an umbrella term for a process or tool used to answer humanities research questions or present information regarding the humanities. In The Digital Humanities Coursebook the author describes the practice of digital humanities as, "...an extension of humanities methods..." (Drucker 5), as apposed to a replacement of already established methods within the field. In the first chapter of The Digital Humanities Coursebook it is also made clear that the tools of Digital Humanities are not always applicable to every research project or question because of the binary nature of the digital where something either is or isn't. In contrast humanities is a nuanced field that involves human interpretation. The first step to any Digital Humanities project is to decide if digital methods will retain, support, or aid t...
Chapter 6 and 7 along with the additional sources added to my understanding of digital humanities as a whole. The key part of chapter 6 was learning what information visualization was and how it is used. All information visualizations are metrics expressed as graphics. Part of everyday communications and scholarships. The book described it as data that can be difficult to interpret in tabular form. This is useful for seeing patterns within large amounts of information. Anything that can be quantified can be put into information visualizations. Making graphics by hand takes a lot of time. Two portions are metrics and graphics. There are helpful guidelines that can be helpful when deciphering what type of chart should be used. A fun fact is the earliest record of visualization was the observation of the planets and other natural cycles. Chapter 7 discusses data mining and text analysis. Data mining is the automated analysis that looks for patte...
Comments
Post a Comment